Legal departments in 2023 are under tremendous pressure to cut costs and often are issued edicts demanding radical reductions in their spend. Most of their efforts focus on slashing either resources (e.g., headcount) or costs (e.g., bringing more work in-house, asking for rate freezes from outside counsel, etc.), but economic conditions aside, the real culprit in their spend management woes lies in perception. Far too many legal departments still see themselves as cost centers, and their organization treats them accordingly – meaning, the only way to deal with cost centers is to continuously find ways to reduce their costs. What the current economic situation is highlighting for legal departments is the need to rethink their mission and reposition themselves within their companies as not a cost center, but as a value-enabling center that becomes a strategic partner for internal clients. There is great variability among legal departments in terms of where they are on this journey, and the same is true with professional services providers catering to legal department needs.  

In Law.com Compass Pacesetter Research: Legal Departments Spend Management 2023-2024, the Pacesetter Advisory Council assessed dozens of providers to arrive at twenty-three Innovators recognized for their unique approaches to legal department spend management challenges. And of those twenty-three, the Pacesetter Research team identified seven leaders of the innovation pack as Pacesetters. The research and analysis also provide insights into the competitive dynamics and service delivery trends driving convergence across legal, management consulting, multi-service, and specialist boutique mobility specialist providers.

Research Highlights

  • Technology has turned budgetary and process efficiency into a surgical science but the truth is that with steadily rising volumes of workload, the law of diminishing returns asserts itself and it quickly becomes apparent that efficiency alone will not solve legal department spend management challenges 
  • The journey for legal departments to becoming a value-enabling center in their company requires recognizing that effective spend management is a combination of balance sheet strategy, resource management, matter (project) management, relationship management, and ultimately – value management
  • An absolute sine qua non for this journey is having dedicated legal operations capabilities and resources
  • Legal departments have key allies on this journey whether they realize it or not both internally (procurement, finance, operations, the board) and externally (law firms seeking to shorten payment cycles, other legal departments)
  • Another important trait of more mature legal departments is a willingness to take the reins in their relationships with outside counsel and other vendors through detailed billing hygiene

What Makes A Pacesetter & Innovator in Legal Departments: Spend Management?

Professional services providers are well aware of this problem, and many have pivoted to help legal departments address it. Law firms are the first place most GCs turn to, and a small but growing handful of law firms recognize that spend management is a crucial relationship enhancement opportunity. Management consulting and multiservice providers have tailored some of their business transformation and performance optimization offerings to legal department needs, including digital transformation offerings. However, the group that has made the most hay from legal departments’ current budgetary woes is a growing cadre of specialized consulting or technology start-ups created by law market veterans frustrated with the unnecessary friction in law firm-legal department relationships.  

The 2023 Legal Departments: Spend Management Innovators & Pacesetters

  • Bain & Company
  • Barnes & Thornburg
  • Baker Donelson
  • BigHand
  • Bryan Cave
  • Crowe
  • Deloitte
  • Elevate
  • EY
  • FTI Consulting
  • HBR Consulting
  • KPMG
  • Kroll
  • Legal Bill Review
  • McKinsey & Company
  • Mitratech
  • Onit
  • Protiviti
  • PwC
  • Seyfarth Shaw
  • Sterling Analytics
  • UpLevel Ops
  • Wolters Kluwer

the methodology

The goal of Pacesetter Research is to help buyers of professional services navigate an increasingly complex landscape with confidence. We use a multidisciplinary perspective to identify best-in-class providers of legal, consulting, financial, insurance, employee benefits, and other professional services and analyze how they are evolving as an ecosystem of interdisciplinary service providers. Our research is grounded in over 50 years of accumulated market insights and qualitative research models that combine knowledge of management science with case studies and other sources of knowledge to understand patterns of market supply, demand, behavior, and ways of doing business. Our research also includes voices/perspectives from both the sellside and buyside, as well as knowledgeable people working in industry associations, academia, etc.

  • The Pacesetter Advisory Council (PAC) convenes in advance of the research project kick-off; members include ALM journalists and editors, and external experts such as consultants, general counsel, and industry thought leaders

  • The PAC selects the set of Innovators that will be covered in the research topic from a larger group of providers that members have identified in the normal course of their work

  • PAC members also provide expert knowledge and insights to the ALM Pacesetter team throughout the research and analysis process

  • The Pacesetter Team within conducts primary and secondary research

  • Primary research includes in-depth interviews with practice leaders at the provider firms covered in the research; satisfaction interviews with clients referred by those providers; and in-depth interviews with thought leaders, recruiting professionals, and other sources

  • Secondary research includes data gathered from annual reports and earnings calls, management presentations, public filings, case studies, press releases, journals and publications, online information databases and other publicly available resources

  • Innovators that achieve a Pacesetter Impact Score equal to or over 85 are designated as Pacesetters

  • Pacesetter analysts map markets and stakeholders and write market trends

  • Market segment overviews are peer reviewed by the appropriate PAC member

Service providers are evaluated and scored based on five core criteria

Business Model

Provider’s ability to reposition core competencies around new products, services, and business models to adapt to shifting patterns of market supply, demand, behavior, and ways of doing business.

Value Proposition

Provider’s ability to deliver on its value proposition, i.e., the positioning statement that communicates the benefits and economic value a prospect will receive by purchasing the provider’s products and services over a competitor’s.

Service Delivery

Provider’s ability to mobilize resources and configure assets to serve clients.

Client Impact

Provider’s ability to help clients affect continuous, sustainable change, mitigate risk, improve performance, and achieve growth.

Brand Eminence

Provider’s ability to leverage brand and marketing strategies to differentiate in its marketplace as an expert practitioner and thought leader.

About The Analyst

Tomek’s focus is on finance management consulting, which includes finance operations, balance sheet strategy & investor relations, portfolio & capital strategy, and transaction advisory services.

Before joining ALM Intelligence, Tomek led the European asset-backed securities (ABS) and global collateralized debt obligation (CDO) report sourcing and research efforts for the asset-backed securities market intelligence firm Lewtan Technologies. Before that he spent five years with Capital Access International, a fixed-income market intelligence firm responsible for bringing the widely known fixed-income investment professional and securities profile tool eMAXX™ to the investment world. He was Director of North American data research when that firm was acquired by Lipper (a Reuters company) in 2002.

Tomek earned a B.A. in History magna cum laude, with a minor in Cultural Anthropology, from SUNY at Buffalo (New York). In 2017 Tomek earned his Masters of Science degree in Applied Economics from Southern New Hampshire University. He also spent several years living and studying in Poland, Hungary, and other regions of Eastern Europe and has authored a successful book (published in late 2013) on Eastern Europe, which is going into its second edition in 2018.

Fill out the form below to download an Executive summary or Abstract, or Request more information

Download an Executive Summary or Abstract:



Request More Information or Pricing:



Connect with Us